Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Formula 2 Pourchaire: MP was “playing with fire” with Imola feature race strategy

Pourchaire: MP was “playing with fire” with Imola feature race strategy

by Craig Woollard

Photo: Formula Motorsport Limited

Theo Pourchaire criticised his Formula 2 title rival Felipe Drugovich’s strategy for last weekend’s Imola feature race after it backfired and left the latter down in 10th.

MP Motorsport’s Drugovich was one of several drivers to start on Pirelli’s medium compound tyre and use the alternative strategy of a late pistop, while Pourchaire started on the ultrasoft compound and pitted for the more durable medium.

Those on the same strategy as ART Grand Prix driver Pourchaire were able to reduce the time loss of their tyre switch by pitting under an early safety car after poleman Juri Vips crashed out.

A late crash for Liam Lawson required the safety car, initially in virtual form (with drivers not allowed to pit) and while the yet-to-stop Drugovich was leading. It switched to a full safety car just as he and Virtuosi Racing’s Marino Sato passed the pit entry, meaning they had to lap at safety car pace before pitting, which promoted Pourchaire to the lead and victory.

Drugovich tweeted “that was quite unfair I would say…” post-race, and the podium finishers were asked for their thoughts on it, assuming Drugovich was referring to the late safety car call.

“He can say whatever he wants, but why didn’t he stop earlier then?” Pourchaire said.

“I mean, you are playing with fire by doing that. We did a classic strategy, option-prime, we know the safety car risk was high and we pitted because there were two safety cars by the beginning of the race.

“I think he is talking about that, right? He is talking about the last [virtual] safety car stopping him from entering the pits. But what do you want to do? There was a crash. There was a big crash with Lawson. It can happen.

“It’s just playing with fire by doing that, and they knew that probably if there wasn’t any safety car, they would have been in the top 10 or doing a good job. Sometimes you need to – I understand you take risks, but it’s like that.

Campos Racing’s Ralph Boschung finished third and was philosophical with his response. “I think it’s quite logical that if you take a high risk, you can have a high reward, but you can have a high penalty as well by taking high risks. That’s life.”

Charouz Racing System’s Enzo Fittipaldi, who claimed a maiden F2 podium in second place, said: “You never know when there’s going to be a safety car or what’s going to happen. You never know the future, especially in F2 races, they’re always crazy.”